Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2024Peer reviewedOpen access

Complaints to the veterinary disciplinary board related to the euthanasia of animals

Berg, Charlotte; Vickers, Hannah

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the formal complaints to the Swedish Veterinary Disciplinary Board (VDB) during the years 2018-2022 related to euthanasia of animals, which are highly relevant to the One Welfare approach. The aim was to examine whether the complaints were justified or not, according to the disciplinary investigations carried out, and whether animals had been exposed to unnecessary suffering during these interventions. The reasons for the complaints were investigated and categorized. The results showed that incorrect treatment or handling of the animal was the most common reason for reporting a veterinarian to the VDB, while the main underlying cause, based on the qualitative analysis, was found to be communication barriers. However, the number of complaints leading to disciplinary outcomes (admonitions or warnings) was very low. The vast majority (45 out of 47) of complaints relating to euthanasia were therefore not legally justified as per the VDB decision, as the veterinary staff were found to have acted correctly from a veterinary and animal welfare perspective. Nevertheless, even unjustified complaints can be very stressful for the veterinarian and should be minimized.

Keywords

animal welfare; companion animals; complaints; euthanasia; One Welfare; veterinary clinic; VDB; VMB

Published in

Frontiers in Veterinary Science
2024, volume: 11, article number: 1480106
Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA

SLU Authors

UKÄ Subject classification

Animal and Dairy Science

Publication identifier

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1480106

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/140141