Oskarsson, Patrik
- Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Land dispossession due to industrial mining has formed an influential part of global land grabbing literature across the Global South. Mine closure, on the other hand, is at present typically left to environmental experts and mining companies in spite of its possibilities to regenerate the land for new environmental and social purposes once a mine inevitably closes. While Indian coal mines are yet to close to contain fossil emissions, some of the first large, open pit mines from the 1990s have closed in recent years for economic reasons. In this article we explore Indian coal mine closure policy and its implementation in the coal town Korba. To do this we draw on national policy, international best practice in mine closure, mine closure planning documents, and ethnographic fieldwork in Korba. Our analysis shows how large funds and significant technical expertise are put to practice governed by voluntary mine closure guidelines. The results of this under-regulated approach are highly mixed with a focus on forest plantations and, in places, aquaculture or tourism parks. Rural, previously miningdependent communities may receive short-term jobs working on closure activities but are otherwise excluded from closure plans intent on continued privatisation and industrialisation. We conclude with a set of policy recommendations based on the international principles and standards of the Society for Ecological Restoration to firstly make regulations mandatory for all sectors and types of mining, and secondly ensure community participation in the regeneration of mined out landscapes.
Mine closure planning; Just transition; Land use; Restoration; Coal; Participatory governance; India
The Extractive industries and society
2026, volume: 27, article number: 101926
Environmental Studies in Social Sciences
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/146857