Oren, Ram
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Abstract
Understanding how different plants prioritize carbon gain and drought vulnerability under a variable water supply is important for predicting which trees will maximize woody biomass production under different environmental conditions. Here, Populus balsamifera (BS, isohydric genotype), P. simonii (SI, previously uncharacterized stomatal behaviour), and their cross, P. balsamifera x simonii (BSxSI, anisohydric genotype) were studied to assess the physiological basis for biomass accumulation and water-use efficiency across a range of water availabilities. Under ample water, whole plant stomatal conductance (g(s)), transpiration (E), and growth rates were higher in anisohydric genotypes (SI and BSxSI) than in isohydric poplars (BS). Under drought, all genotypes regulated the leaf to stem water potential gradient via changes in g(s), synchronizing leaf hydraulic conductance (K-leaf) and E: isohydric plants reduced K-leaf, g(s), and E, whereas anisohydric genotypes maintained high K-leaf and E, which reduced both leaf and stem water potentials. Nevertheless, SI poplars reduced their plant hydraulic conductance (K-plant) during water stress and, unlike, BSxSI plants, recovered rapidly from drought. Low g(s) of the isohydric BS under drought reduced CO2 assimilation rates and biomass potential under moderate water stress. While anisohydric genotypes had the fastest growth under ample water and higher photosynthetic rates under increasing water stress, isohydric poplars had higher water-use efficiency. Overall, the results indicate three strategies for how closely related biomass species deal with water stress: survival-isohydric (BS), sensitive-anisohydric (BSxSI), and resilience-anisohydric (SI). Implications for woody biomass growth, water-use efficiency, and survival under variable environmental conditions are discussed.
Keywords
Bioenergy; biomass; carbon; hydraulic conductance; stomata; transpiration
Published in
Journal of Experimental Botany
2015, volume: 66, number: 14, pages: 4373-4381
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
SLU Authors
UKÄ Subject classification
Forest Science
Publication identifier
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv195
Permanent link to this page (URI)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/68506