Abstract
In the ageing society more old employees need to stay in working life
for longer. However, the society also needs to take care of the
increased amount of elderly in a more effective and respectful way. To
take care of older employees experience knowledge to make the elderly
care and the care employees work situation better and self-crediting to
go on in an extended working life, new methods and measures are needed
to be developed and evaluated. The overall purpose of this article was
to evaluate how the participant in the intervention project experienced
the project and its methodology. The intervention project followed three
different methods: i) through interviews of the participants and the
supervisor; ii) through participant observation; and iii) through an
evaluation questionnaire to participants after the project was
completed. The intervention project did transfer knowledge between
different fields, that are, between generations, between different
departments and between the municipality and county. The participation
was described as not only a place for reflection and knowledge, but also
a protected zone where participants could talk about the kind of
problems they would ponder over. Several participants felt that it was
important to develop and continue the work that the intervention project
set in motion. The participants’ experience was made to be visible and
their professional competence has been strengthened. They indicated that
there had been an exchange of knowledge and between not only the
generations but also the different kinds of work. The organisations also
seem to have gained from the project by allowing the participants to
unload, become more positive, develop more knowledge of experience,
increase their propensity for reflection and get a better consensus
between the municipality and county. The intervention project seems to
have fulfilled the stated purpose and also the expectations of the
participants.
Published in
Open Journal of Social Sciences
2017, volume: 5, number: 7, article number: 77557
SLU Authors
UKĂ„ Subject classification
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Publication identifier
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2017.57006
Permanent link to this page (URI)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/92873