Forest owner objectives typologies: Instruments for each owner type or instruments for most owner types?

Abstract

The extensive literature on non-industrial private forest owner typologies often assumes that different forest owner types will respond to different policy instruments according to shared forest ownership objectives. Forest owner typologies using principal component analysis and subsequent k-means clustering techniques are now prolific. The surprisingly little empirical work linking forest owner objectives typologies with forest owner opinions or experiences of different policy instruments, however, shows ambiguous support for recommended targeting efforts. This study uses standard tools of analysis to investigate the relationship between private forest owners' ownership objectives and their opinions on forest conservation policy instruments. Results show some statistically significant, but in absolute terms weak relationships between ownership objectives and Sweden's command and control green tree retention measures, participation in voluntary forest stewardship certification, acceptance of a hypothetical financial incentive, and overall interest in taking more environmentally beneficial forest management measures. These results suggest the benefits of targeting different kinds of instruments to different kinds of ownership objectives may be limited.

Published in

Forest Policy and Economics
2019, Volume: 105, pages: 72-82 Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

SLU Authors

• Danley, Brian

  • Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG15 Life on land


UKÄ Subject classification

Economics
Forest Science


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.018

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/100639