Skip to main content
Research article - Peer-reviewed, 2020

Coerced regimes: management challenges in the Anthropocene

Angeler, David; Chaffin, Brian C.; Sundstrom, Shana M.; Garmestani, Ahjond; Pope, Kevin L.; Uden, Daniel R.; Twidwell, Dirac; Allen, Craig R.

Abstract

Management frequently creates system conditions that poorly mimic the conditions of a desirable self-organizing regime. Such management is ubiquitous across complex systems of people and nature and will likely intensify as these systems face rapid change. However, it is highly uncertain whether the costs (unintended consequences, including negative side effects) of management but also social dynamics can eventually outweigh benefits in the long term. We introduce the term "coerced regime" to conceptualize this management form and tie it into resilience theory. The concept encompasses proactive and reactive management to maintain desirable and mitigate undesirable regime conditions, respectively. A coerced regime can be quantified through a measure of the amount of management required to artificially maintain its desirable conditions. Coerced regimes comprise "ghosts" of self-sustaining desirable system regimes but ultimately become "dead regimes walking" when these regimes collapse as soon as management is discontinued. We demonstrate the broad application of coerced regimes using distinct complex systems of humans and nature (human subjects, aquatic and terrestrial environments, agriculture, and global climate). We discuss commonalities and differences between these examples to identify trade-offs between benefits and harms of management. The concept of coerced regimes can spur thinking and inform management about the duality of what we know and can envision versus what we do not know and therefore cannot envision: a pervasive sustainability conundrum as planet Earth swiftly moves toward a future without historical analogue.

Keywords

alternative regimes; coercion; interdisciplinary; management; mitigation; resilience; restoration

Published in

Ecology and Society
2020, volume: 25, number: 1, article number: 4

Authors' information

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Chaffin, Brian C.
University of Montana
Sundstrom, Shana M.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Garmestani, Ahjond
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Garmestani, Ahjond
Utrecht University
Pope, Kevin L.
United States Geological Survey
Uden, Daniel R.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Twidwell, Dirac
University of Nebraska Lincoln
Allen, Craig R.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln

UKÄ Subject classification

Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Ecology

Publication Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11286-250104

URI (permanent link to this page)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/104522