Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2021Peer reviewedOpen access

Mixing has limited impacts on the foliar nutrition of European beech and Scots pine trees across Europe

de Streel, Geraud; Ammer, Christian; Annighoefer, Peter; Barbeito, Ignacio; Bielak, Kamil; Bravo-Oviedo, Andres; Brazaitis, Gediminas; Buraczyk, Wlodzimierz; Collet, Catherine; Hurt, Vaclav; Kurylyak, Viktor; den Ouden, Jan; Pach, Maciej; Pretzsch, Hans; Skrzyszewski, Jerzy; Sramek, Vit; Stankeviciute, Jolanta; Strelcova, Katarina; Svoboda, Miroslav; Verheyen, Kris;
Show more authors

Abstract

Tree species-mixing has been suggested as one option to counteract the adverse effects of global change on tree mineral nutrition, yet the effect of mixing on nutrient availability remains poorly documented.We therefore analyzed the current foliar nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) quantities and ilr balances (isometric log transformed ratios between elements or groups of elements) for 261 European beech and 248 Scots pine trees from 15 sites, each consisting of one beech-pine mixed stand and the respective monocultures, across a gradient of environmental conditions in Europe. We hypothesized an overall positive effect of mixing on tree foliar nutrient content, and that this mixing effect would be stronger on nutrient-poor sites. Using linear mixed models and multivariate linear regression models, we first tested for the effects of species (beech/pine) and composition (pure/mixed) across all sites; we then investigated whether the species-mixing effect was related to site fertility.The nutrient composition of beech leaves and pine needles differed significantly for all ilr balances. For both species, significant mixing effects were detected for some nutrients and ilr balances; those effects, however, could not be consistently related to contrasted nutrient composition between species. For most nutrients and ilr balances, the mixing effect was influenced by the site nutritional status, but the pattern differed from expectation: absence or minor differences between monocultures and mixtures at the lower end of the chemical fertility gradient, and maximum differences in rich soils.The contrasting foliar nutrient composition of pine and beech trees and the site nutrient status only partly explained the mixing effects on tree mineral nutrition. Our results claim for a better understanding of nutrientrelated mechanisms associated with complementarity and points towards the need to further expand the existing frameworks to account for the multivariate nature of tree nutrition.

Keywords

Foliar nutrition; Complementarity; Species mixture; Fagus sylvatica L.; Pinus sylvestris L.

Published in

Forest Ecology and Management
2021, Volume: 479, article number: 118551Publisher: ELSEVIER

    UKÄ Subject classification

    Forest Science

    Publication identifier

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118551

    Permanent link to this page (URI)

    https://res.slu.se/id/publ/109501