Lutter, Reimo
- Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
- Estonian University of Life Sciences
Research article2021Peer reviewedOpen access
Rusalepp, Linda; Lutter, Reimo; Hepner, Heiki; Kaasik, Ants; Tullus, Arvo
center dot Key message Non-selective thinning of a hybrid aspen coppice stands via corridor or cross-corridor cutting impacts residual trees differently depending on their competitive status. Suppressed residual trees' metabolic profile indicates increased stress level, especially after cross-corridor thinning. center dot Context Early thinning with regular corridor harvests is proposed for the management of post-harvest re-sprouted hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x P. tremuloides Michx.) coppice stands. The selection of remaining trees is not size-based and their physiological acclimation to the post-thinning conditions is unknown. center dot Aims To analyse differences in secondary metabolite profile between thinning treatments and trees competitive status. center dot Methods We used an HPLC-qTOF mass spectrometer to analyse the leaf extracts of dominant and suppressed trees from stands with different thinning intensities: un-thinned control with basal area of 15.4 +/- 1.52 m(2) ha(-1), corridor thinning with basal area of 8.5 +/- 0.46 m(2) ha(-1) and cross-corridor thinning with basal area of 3.9 +/- 0.34 m(2) ha(-1). center dot Results Competitive status and thinning treatment both had significant effects on the contents of compounds. Higher exposure to irradiance increased the contents of flavonoids and hydroxycinnamates. Corridor thinning treatments doubled the foliar contents of secondary metabolites and lowered macronutrient contents in competitively suppressed residual trees. Dominant residual trees were not affected in this respect. center dot Conclusion Forest management practice and competitive status can significantly modify the metabolite profile in tree leaves. After corridor thinning of a young aspen coppice stand, the small-sized residual trees may initially respond with increased allocation to leaf chemical defence rather than to productivity.
Growth-defense trade-off; Intraspecific competition; Populus; Forest management; HPLC
Annals of Forest Science
2021, Volume: 78, number: 1, article number: 1Publisher: SPRINGER FRANCE
Forest Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-01014-3
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/110346