Ström Hallenberg, Gunilla
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2021Peer reviewedOpen access
Huber, Laura; Hallenberg, Gunilla Strom; Lunha, Kamonwan; Leangapichart, Thongpan; Jiwakanon, Jatesada; Hickman, Rachel A.; Magnusson, Ulf; Sunde, Marianne; Jarhult, Josef D.; Van Boeckel, Thomas P.
In Thailand, pig production has increased considerably in the last decades to meet a growing demand for pork. Antimicrobials are used routinely in intensive pig production to treat infections and increase productivity. However, the use of antimicrobials also contributes to the rise of antimicrobial resistance with potential consequences for animal and human health. Here, we quantify the association between antimicrobial use and resistance rates in extensive and intensive farms with a focus on geographic proximity between farm and drugstores. Of the 164 enrolled farms, 79% reported using antimicrobials for disease prevention, treatment, or as a feed additive. Antimicrobial-resistant E. coli were present in 63% of farms. These drugs included critically important antimicrobials, such as quinolones and penicillins. Medium-scale farms with intensive animal production practices showed higher resistance rates than small-scale farms with extensive practices. Farms with drug-resistant Escherichia coli were located closer to drugstores and a had a higher proportion of disease than farms without drug-resistant E. coli. We found no association between the presence of resistance in humans and antimicrobial use in pigs. Our findings call for actions to improve herd health to reduce the need for antimicrobials and systematic training of veterinarians and drugstore owners on judicious use of antimicrobials in animals to mitigate resistance.
Escherichia coli; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial use; pig; intensive production
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
2021, Volume: 8, article number: 659051Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
AMR: Bacteria
SDG3 Good health and well-being
Clinical Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.659051
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/112140