Skip to main content
Research article - Peer-reviewed, 2021

Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

Virkkala, Anna-Maria; Aalto, Juha; Rogers, Brendan M.; Tagesson, Torbern; Treat, Claire C.; Natali, Susan M.; Watts, Jennifer D.; Potter, Stefano; Lehtonen, Aleksi; Mauritz, Marguerite; Schuur, Edward A. G.; Kochendorfer, John; Zona, Donatella; Oechel, Walter; Kobayashi, Hideki; Humphreys, Elyn; Goeckede, Mathias; Iwata, Hiroki; Lafleur, Peter M.; Euskirchen, Eugenie S.;
Show more authors

Abstract

The regional variability in tundra and boreal carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes can be high, complicating efforts to quantify sink-source patterns across the entire region. Statistical models are increasingly used to predict (i.e., upscale) CO2 fluxes across large spatial domains, but the reliability of different modeling techniques, each with different specifications and assumptions, has not been assessed in detail. Here, we compile eddy covariance and chamber measurements of annual and growing season CO2 fluxes of gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (ER), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) during 1990-2015 from 148 terrestrial high-latitude (i.e., tundra and boreal) sites to analyze the spatial patterns and drivers of CO2 fluxes and test the accuracy and uncertainty of different statistical models. CO2 fluxes were upscaled at relatively high spatial resolution (1 km(2)) across the high-latitude region using five commonly used statistical models and their ensemble, that is, the median of all five models, using climatic, vegetation, and soil predictors. We found the performance of machine learning and ensemble predictions to outperform traditional regression methods. We also found the predictive performance of NEE-focused models to be low, relative to models predicting GPP and ER. Our data compilation and ensemble predictions showed that CO2 sink strength was larger in the boreal biome (observed and predicted average annual NEE -46 and -29 g C m(-2) yr(-1), respectively) compared to tundra (average annual NEE +10 and -2 g C m(-2) yr(-1)). This pattern was associated with large spatial variability, reflecting local heterogeneity in soil organic carbon stocks, climate, and vegetation productivity. The terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget, estimated using the annual NEE ensemble prediction, suggests the high-latitude region was on average an annual CO2 sink during 1990-2015, although uncertainty remains high.

Keywords

Arctic; CO2 balance; empirical; greenhouse gas; land; permafrost; remote sensing

Published in

Global Change Biology
2021, volume: 27, number: 17, pages: 4040-4059
Publisher: WILEY

Authors' information

Virkkala, Anna-Maria
University of Helsinki
Aalto, Juha
University of Helsinki
Rogers, Brendan M.
Woodwell Climate Research Center
Tagesson, Torbern
University of Copenhagen
Treat, Claire C.
Helmholtz Association
Natali, Susan M.
Woodwell Climate Research Center
Watts, Jennifer D.
Woodwell Climate Research Center
Potter, Stefano
Woodwell Climate Research Center
Lehtonen, Aleksi
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
Mauritz, Marguerite
University of Texas El Paso
Schuur, Edward A. G.
Northern Arizona University
Kochendorfer, John
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Zona, Donatella
University of Sheffield
Oechel, Walter
University of Exeter
Kobayashi, Hideki
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
Humphreys, Elyn
Carleton University
Goeckede, Mathias
Max Planck Society
Iwata, Hiroki
Shinshu University
Lafleur, Peter M.
Trent University
Euskirchen, Eugenie S.
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Show more authors

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG13 Climate action

UKÄ Subject classification

Ecology

Publication Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15659

URI (permanent link to this page)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/112545