Skip to main content
Research article - Peer-reviewed, 2021

How are ecological approaches justified in European rural development policy? Evidence from a content analysis of CAP and rural development discourses

Leduc, Gaëlle; Manevska Tasevska, Gordana; Hansson, Helena; Arndt, Marie; Bakucs, Zoltán; Böhm, Michael; Chitea, Mihai; Florian, Violeta; Luca, Lucian; Martikainen, Anna; Pham, Hai Vu; Rusu, Marioara;

Abstract


Ecological approaches to farming are gaining increasing interest in the EU's Rural Development (RD) policy. From a societal perspective, these approaches are expected to deliver public goods in terms of environmental and social benefits for both consumers and rural actors. This study aims to investigate the policy discourses that are being used in the Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) of Sweden, France, Bavaria, Hungary, Poland and Romania to depict and justify the support for ecological approaches across three programming periods of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). For this purpose, a model integrating both CAP and RD discourses was developed and applied using deductive content analysis focused on the policy documents of RDPs. The results suggest that during the entire CAP period from 2000 to 2020, ecological approaches were mainly justified in a multifunctionality discourse, especially with the two RD discourses of i) nature conservation in all considered EU member states and regions, with the exception of Sweden, and ii) agri-ruralism, including Sweden. The neomercantilist discourse appears to be the third most dominant discourse in the two most recent CAP periods from 2007 to 2013 and 2014–2020, becoming more prominent between these two periods. Ecological approaches are almost never advocated along liberal lines as the neo-liberalist discourse is almost absent. These results highlight that these six EU member states and regions recognize the potential of these approaches for delivering public goods, despite a lesser emphasis on socio-economic benefits

Keywords

Common agricultural policy; Content analysis; Discourse; Ecological approaches; Rural development programmes

Published in

Journal of Rural Studies

2021, volume: 86, pages: 611-622

Authors' information

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics
Arndt, Marie
Ecozept
Bakucs, Zoltán
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies
Böhm, Michael
Ecozept
Chitea, Mihai
Institute of Agricultural Economics
Florian, Violeta
Institute of Agricultural Economics
Luca, Lucian
Institute of Agricultural Economics
Martikainen, Anna
Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN)
Pham, Hai Vu
National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA)
Rusu, Marioara
Institute of Agricultural Economics

UKÄ Subject classification

Human Geography
Agricultural Science

Publication Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.009

URI (permanent link to this page)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/112880