Skip to main content
Review article - Peer-reviewed, 2021

What is the effect of giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources on biodiversity in semi-natural pastures? A systematic review protocol

Envall, Ida; Bengtsson, Jan; Jakobsson, Simon; Rundlof, Maj; Aberg, Charlotte; Lindborg, Regina

Abstract

Background: Semi-natural pastures are unfertilized grasslands with a long history of traditional low-input grazing management. This kind of pastures are recognized for their high species richness. However, as a consequence of modernization of agriculture, many of the semi-natural pastures have been lost during the last century, leading to a serious threat to farmland biodiversity. Semi-natural pastures are relatively low in productivity. Hence, to increase profitability, farmers may want to give the grazing animals access to additional nutrient sources. This can be done either as supplementary feeding, or by fencing the semi-natural pastures into the same enclosure as improved, more nutrient-rich, pastures. These practices are, however, controversial. It is argued that since semi-natural pastures are species-rich partly because they are nutrient-poor, introducing additional nutrients into the system should be avoided. Accordingly, in Sweden, these interventions are often prohibited while receiving financial subsidies for management of semi-natural pastures. However, since many farmers are dependent on such support to maintain their pastures, these prohibitions often cause problems. The question has been raised whether giving the grazers access to additional nutrient sources really affect the biodiversity in semi-natural pastures, as is assumed. The primary aim of the proposed systematic review is to answer this question.Method: Peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched for using bibliographic databases, search engines, specialist websites and stakeholder contacts. The references will be screened for relevance according to a predefined set of eligibility criteria. The criteria will be tested and clarified iteratively, until consistency in interpretations is achieved. Thereafter, the literature will be screened in two stages, first based upon title and abstract and then by examining full texts. Full text screening will be performed with blinded decisions by two independent reviewers. Each relevant study will then be critically appraised, based on a set of predefined validity criteria. A narrative synthesis will be provided, outlining the evidence base in terms of bibliographic information and study metadata. If possible, quantitative syntheses based on meta-analyses will be performed. Identified relevant knowledge gaps will be highlighted and discussed.

Keywords

Grasslands; Grazing management; Supplementary feeding; Creep feeding; Nutrient relocation; Biological diversity; Species diversity; Functional diversity; Cattle; Livestock

Published in

Environmental Evidence
2021, volume: 10, number: 1, article number: 16
Publisher: BMC

Authors' information

Envall, Ida
Swedish Research Council Formas
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology
Jakobsson, Simon
Norwegian Institute Nature Research
Rundlof, Maj
Lund University
Aberg, Charlotte
Swedish Research Council Formas
Lindborg, Regina
Stockholm University

Associated SLU-program

SLUsystematic

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG15 Life on land

UKÄ Subject classification

Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

Publication Identifiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-021-00230-2

URI (permanent link to this page)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/113152