Sundar, Jenifer Seematti
- Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2021Peer reviewedOpen access
Yang, Li-Na; Liu, Hao; Wang, Yan-Ping; Seematti, Jenifer; Grenville-Briggs, Laura J. J.; Wang, Zonghua; Zhan, Jiasui
Phytophthora infestans, the most damaging oomycete pathogen of potato, is specialized to grow sporangiophore through opened stomata for secondary inoculum production. However, it is still unclear which metabolic pathways in potato are manipulated by P. infestans in the guard cell-pathogen interactions to open the stomata. Here microscopic observations and cell biology were used to investigate antagonistic interactions between guard cells and the oomycete pathogen. We observed that the antagonistic interactions started at the very beginning of infection. Stomatal movement is an important part of the immune response of potato to P. infestans infection and this occurs through guard cell death and stomatal closure. We observed that P. infestans appeared to manipulate metabolic processes in guard cells, such as triacylglycerol (TAG) breakdown, starch degradation, H2O2 scavenging, and NO catabolism, which are involved in stomatal movement, to evade these stomatal defense responses. The signal transduction pathway of P. infestans-induced stomatal opening likely starts from H2O2 and NO scavenging, along with TAG breakdown while the subsequent starch degradation reinforces the opening process by strengthening guard cell turgor and opening the stomata to their maximum aperture. These results suggest that stomata are a barrier stopping P. infestans from completing its life cycle, but this host defense system can be bypassed through the manipulation of diverse metabolic pathways that may be induced by P. infestans effector proteins.
stomatal immunity; starch degradation; triacylglycerol breakdown; phytophthora infestans; potato defences
Frontiers in Plant Science
2021, Volume: 12, article number: 668797
Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
SLU Plant Protection Network
Agricultural Science
Cell Biology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.668797
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/113302