Research article - Peer-reviewed, 2021
Development and Application of Liquid Chromatographic Retention Time Indices in HRMS-Based Suspect and Nontarget Screening
Aalizadeh, Reza; Alygizakis, Nikiforos A.; Schymanski, Emma L.; Krauss, Martin; Schulze, Tobias; Ibanez, Maria; McEachran, Andrew D.; Chao, Alex; Williams, Antony J.; Gago-Ferrero, Pablo; Covaci, Adrian; Moschet, Christoph; Young, Thomas M.; Hollender, Juliane; Slobodnik, Jaroslav; Thomaidis, Nikolaos S.Abstract
There is an increasing need for comparable and harmonized retention times (t(R) ) in liquid chromatography (LC) among different laboratories, to provide supplementary evidence for the identity of compounds in high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)-based suspect and nontarget screening investigations. In this study, a rigorously tested, flexible, and less system-dependent unified retention time index (RTI) approach for LC is presented, based on the calibration of the elution pattern. Two sets of 18 calibrants were selected for each of ESI+ and ESI-based on the maximum overlap with the retention times and chemical similarity indices from a total set of 2123 compounds. The resulting calibration set, with RTI set to range between 1 and 1000, was proposed as the most appropriate RTI system after rigorous evaluation, coordinated by the NORMAN network. The validation of the proposed RTI system was done externally on different instrumentation and LC conditions. The RTI can also be used to check the reproducibility and quality of LC conditions. Two quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR)-based models were built based on the developed RTI systems, which assist in the removal of false-positive annotations. The applicability domains of the QSRR models allowed completing the identification process with higher confidence for substances within the domain, while indicating those substances for which results should be treated with caution. The proposed RTI system was used to improve confidence in suspect and nontarget screening and increase the comparability between laboratories as demonstrated for two examples.Published in
Analytical Chemistry2021, volume: 93, number: 33, pages: 11601-11611
Publisher: AMER CHEMICAL SOC
Authors' information
Aalizadeh, Reza
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Alygizakis, Nikiforos A.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Schymanski, Emma L.
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG)
Krauss, Martin
Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ)
Schulze, Tobias
Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ)
Ibanez, Maria
Universitat Jaume I
McEachran, Andrew D.
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Chao, Alex
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Williams, Antony J.
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ferrero, Pablo Gago
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment
Ferrero, Pablo Gago
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC)
Covaci, Adrian
University of Antwerp
Moschet, Christoph
University of California Davis
Young, Thomas M.
University of California Davis
Hollender, Juliane
ETH Zurich
Slobodnik, Jaroslav
Environmental Institute
Thomaidis, Nikolaos S.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
UKÄ Subject classification
Analytical Chemistry
Publication Identifiers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02348
URI (permanent link to this page)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/113472