Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour: a systematic map protocolMartin, Jake M.; Bertram, Michael; Blanchfield, Paul J.; Brand, Jack A.; Brodin, Tomas; Brooks, Bryan W.; Cerveny, Daniel; Lagisz, Malgorzata; Ligocki, Isaac Y.; Michelangeli, Marcus; Nakagawa, Shinichi; Orford, Jack T.; Sundin, Josefin; Tan, Hung; Wong, Bob B. M.; McCallum, Erin
Background: Globally, there is growing concern over the impacts of pharmaceuticals and drug manufacturing on aquatic animals, and pharmaceuticals are now recognized as contaminants of emerging environmental concern. In recent years, scientists, environmental managers, and policymakers have been interested in using behavioural endpoints for chemical regulation, given their importance for ftness and survival. The body of research on whether and how pharmaceutical exposure alters the behaviour of aquatic animals has grown exponentially, making it diffcult to get an overview of the results. With an international spotlight on the management of these environmental threats, synthesizing the currently available data is vital to inform managers and policymakers, as well as highlighting areas where more research is needed. This is a protocol for a systematic evidence map (SEM) and serves as an a priori record of our objectives and methodological decisions. Our objectives are to identify, catalogue, and present primary research articles on the efects of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour.
Methods: The literature search will be conducted using two electronic databases: Web of Science and Scopus, and we will supplement these searches with additional sources. The search string has been developed using a Population–Exposure–Comparison–Outcome (PECO) framework, to capture articles that used an aquatic organism (P, population) to test the efects of a pharmaceutical (E, exposure) on behaviour (O, outcome). Eligible articles must also have a control group (C, comparison). Articles will be screened in two stages, title and abstract, followed by full-text screening before data extraction. Decision trees have been designed a priori to appraise articles for eligibility at both stages of screening. At both stages, screening each article will be completed by two independent reviewers. Study validity will be appraised but not used as a basis for article inclusion. The information extracted from the eligible articles, along with bibliometric data, will be mapped and displayed. All data associated with this SEM will be publicly available through the Open Science Framework (OSF) and a future project webpage.
Keywordsmedicine; neurotoxicology; psychoactive; ecotoxicology; evidence synthesis; fitness
Published inEnvironmental Evidence
2021, volume: 10, number: 1, article number: 26
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG6 Clean water and sanitation
SDG14 Life below water
SDG12 Responsible consumption and production
UKÄ Subject classification
URI (permanent link to this page)