Abstract

Objective – The study aims to: 1) assess the relationship between the quality of hospital's public spaces expressed in  terms of accessibility and visibility of art and greenery and users' restorative experiences; 2) highlight how physical  environment may promote health and wellbeing of patients and staff/user.

Background – The issue of public spaces in hospitals is very debated today: the direction taken by a few decades is  to implement these spaces giving them a humanization feature to promote the well-being of patients and staff.  Architectural trends have developed around the creation of halls, mostly glazed, with more volumes appearing, and  large dimensions. The importance of restorative spaces as a mediator factor for health outcomes among the users is  increasingly recognized.

Research questions – 1) Which public spaces are perceived to be more restorative? 2) Does familiarity with a place  affect the users’ perception of restoration in hospital public spaces? 3) To what extent does the perception of  restoration vary across settings that support similar functions but present varying levels of art and greenery? 4) How  does the combined use of Technical Environmental Analysis (TEA) and Observed Based Environmental Assessments  (OBEA) measures support our understanding of perceived restoration across different public spaces in hospital  settings?

Methods – A cross-sectional investigation was performed in seven public spaces of the Santa Maria Nuova Hospital  (IT) by adopting TEA and OBEA tools.

Technical Environmental Analysis:

• Visits on site to evaluate the quality of the space, to assess the presence of artworks and/or greenery and to describe  the historicity of the space

• Spatial analysis: Space Syntax evaluation parameters (Hillier, 2007) to evaluate the integration of the space (e.g., visibility, accessibility) and to quantify the presence of artworks and green view (% isovist area from key points),  performed by Visibility Graph Analysis (VGA) and Isovist Analysis.

Observed Based Environmental Assessments:

• This type of assessments implies an evaluation of public spaces done by the users (n = 327) (i.e., outpatient, staff,  relative, volunteer and social services). Their recruitment was done in place.

• Adapted version of the Perceived Restoration Scale (PRS) (1-5 Likert scale). 

Results – Overall the results seem to suggest that the public spaces had relatively high restorative qualities. However,  significant higher perceived restoration was also found for the Medicherie cloister, suggesting that some architectural  and natural features affected the result. In order to gain a better understanding of what aspects of the physical  environment of hospital public spaces might have had an impact on users’ perception of restoration TEA and OBEA,  data were merged together and their interaction was discussed. 

Conclusion – New insights about the concept of restoration and its interaction with physical characteristics of  hospital’s public spaces is put forward. Furthermore, the methodology proposed by linking TEA and OBEA data  contributes to a more reliable understanding of the influence that existing buildings might have on users’ well-being. 

Keywords

Hospital public spaces; physical environment influence ; evaluation tools; spatial layout; users’ perception

Published in

SINTEF Proceedings
2021, number: 8, pages: 288-301
Title: Proceedings from the 4th Conference on Architecture Research Care & Health
eISBN: 978-82-536-1718-3
Publisher: SINTEF Academic Press

Conference

ARCH19, 4th Conference on Architecture Research Care & Health, 190612-190613, Trondheim, Norway

UKÄ Subject classification

Architecture
Landscape Architecture
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology


Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/114478