Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2022Peer reviewedOpen access

Mammal responses to predator scents across multiple study areas

Sunde, Peter; Boecker, Felix; Rauset, Geir Rune; Kjellander, Petter; Chrenkova, Monika; Skovdal, Trine Munck; Calkoen, Suzanne van Beeck; Mayer, Martin; Heurich, Marco

Abstract

Antipredator behaviors allow prey to mitigate the impacts of their predators. We investigated antipredator responses of two herbivore species, roe deer and European hare, and one mesopredator, red fox, toward predation risk imposed by lynx and wolf. We collected data (using camera traps) on visitation frequency and vigilance behavior to olfactory predator stimuli during 158 standardized scent trials in five areas across Europe, where lynx and wolves either occurred or had been absent for centuries. After a period without scent, trial sites were either marked with lynx or wolf urine, or butyric acid (unspecific scent used to contrast species-specific scent responses). We expected the two herbivores to respond aversively (reduced visitation frequency, and increased vigilance) to predator urine, while red foxes (scavengers) might adopt a risk-sensitive exploration strategy by increasing vigilance near predator urine without reducing visitation frequency. For all species, we expected stronger responses toward the ambush predator lynx than to the pursue predator wolf (cryptic predator hypothesis). If prey responds more strongly to predator stimuli when coexisting with the predator, we expected stronger reactions to predator urine in areas where predators occurred (naive prey hypothesis). Roe deer significantly avoided lynx urine and butyric acid, but not wolf urine. However, roe deer visitation frequency did not differ between scent treatment with large carnivore urine and butyric acid (suggesting that roe deer generally avoid areas with unfamiliar scent), or between areas where large carnivores were present and absent. Hares did not significantly avoid predator urine. Red foxes were attracted to lynx urine in sympatry, but not in allopatry with large carnivores. They increased vigilance rates in the presence of lynx urine independent of sympatry/allopatry with large carnivores. These findings generally confirm our expectations of predator avoidance by herbivores, and attraction combined with increased vigilance of mesopredators. In all species, lynx urine elicited stronger responses than wolf urine (although not significantly different), which to some extent conforms to the cryptic predator hypothesis. We found no support for the naive prey hypothesis. However, higher attraction of red foxes to lynx urine in sympatric situations might indicate that positive responses by scavengers are learning based.

Keywords

antipredator behavior; avoidance; Canis lupus; Capreolus capreolus; intra-guild predation; landscapes of fear; Lepus europaeus; Lynx lynx; odor; risk-sensitive foraging; vigilance; Vulpes vulpes

Published in

Ecosphere
2022, Volume: 13, number: 8, article number: e4215Publisher: WILEY

      SLU Authors

    • Rauset, Geir Rune

      • Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
      • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
    • UKÄ Subject classification

      Ecology
      Zoology

      Publication identifier

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4215

      Permanent link to this page (URI)

      https://res.slu.se/id/publ/123088