Vågsholm, Ivar
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2009Peer reviewedOpen access
Andreoletti, Olivier; Budka, Herbert; Buncic, Sava; Collins, John D; Griffin, John; Hald, Tine; Havelaar, Arie; Hope, James; Klein, Gunter; McLauchlin, James; Messens, Winy; Müller-Graf, Christine; Nguyen-The, Christophe; Noerrung, Birgit; Peixe, Luisa; Prieto, Maradona Miguel; Ricci, Antonia; Sofos, John; Threlfall, John; Vågsholm, Ivar;
Show more authors
EFSA’s Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) was asked by the European Commission to clarify i) whether additional testing for Clostridium perfringens of the end product obtained from biogas and compost transformation of Animal By-Products (ABPs) would respond to the concerns expressed in the EFSA 2005 opinion on "the safety vis-à-vis biological risks of biogas and compost treatment standards of animal by-products" and, should this was not be the case, ii) to indicate if additional testing, according to the model of method 7 of the ABP Regulation, for another pathogen than Clostridium perfringens would respond to the recommendations laid down in the abovementioned opinion. Considering that digestion residues and compost are intended to be applied on land, that land naturally contains bacterial spores and that Clostridium perfringens is ubiquitous, the BIOHAZ Panel concluded that the absence of Clostridium perfringens is not necessary. The BIOHAZ Panel also concluded that end product testing does not respond to the recommendations given in the previous EFSA opinion, which concerns the validation of the efficacy of a process
Animal By-Products; Biogas; Compost; Clostridium perfringens; Technical assistance
EFSA Journal
2009, Volume: 7, number: 11, article number: 1370
Publisher: European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Food Science
Agricultural Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1370
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/27012