Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2012Peer reviewedOpen access

Food availability and offspring demand influence sex-specific patterns and repeatability of parental provisioning

Low, Matthew; Makan, Troy; Castro, Isabel

Abstract

Few studies have examined interactions between resource availability, life-history traits and sexual conflict on species-specificprovisioning rates, and within-individual variation of parental care. To this end, we used 1129 nest observation periods from 118nests across 4 populations to examine how parental nest visitation varied according to sex, food availability, and offspring need(brood size and age) in the stitchbird (hihi: Notiomystis cincta). Males increased their provisioning proportional to brood sizeregardless of food availability, whereas females did not increase provisioning to larger broods unless food supplemented. Maleprovisioning consistently followed the age-dependent energy requirements of the nestlings, whereas females showed little or nobrood age-provisioning relationships. Thus, males were more sensitive than females to changes in the energy demands of theiroffspring; however, this was probably because females were already providing food at a high rate and could not respond toincreased demand unless given additional food. Sex and habitat-specific repeatability estimates of parental effort suggest thatvariation in female provisioning behavior tends to be driven by differences in the local environment, whereas variation in maleprovisioning is more related to differences in individual quality. These sex-specific responses of parental care can be largelyexplained by the relative benefits of provisioning; females provisioned at a high rate to offspring they knew to be their own, basedon available resources. In contrast, when food was abundant, males did not increase their provisioning to offspring probablybecause of the opportunity for additional matings via forced extrapair copulations. Key words: chick feeding, parental effort,parental investment, sealed bid, supplementary feeding, translocation. [Behav Ecol 23:25-34 (2012)]

Published in

Behavioral Ecology
2012, Volume: 23, number: 1, pages: 25-34

    UKÄ Subject classification

    Evolutionary Biology
    Behavioral Sciences Biology
    Zoology

    Publication identifier

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr145

    Permanent link to this page (URI)

    https://res.slu.se/id/publ/40946