Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2010Peer reviewedOpen access

Integrating livelihoods and conservation in protected areas: understanding the role and stakeholder views on prospects for non-timber forest products, a Bangladesh case study

Mukul, Sharif Ahmed; Uddin, Mohammad Belal; Rashid, A.Z.M.Manzoor; Fox, Jefferson

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) represent a key global strategy in biodiversity conservation. In tropical developing countries, the management of PAs is a great challenge as many contain resources on which local communities rely. Collection and trading of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is a well-established forest-based livelihood strategy, which has been promoted as a potential means for enhanced conservation and improved rural livelihoods in recent years, even though the sustainability or ecological implications have rarely been tested. We conducted an exploratory survey to understand the role and stakeholder views on conservation prospects and perceived ecological feasibility of NTFPs and harvesting schemes in a northeastern PA of Bangladesh, namely the Satchari National Park. Households (n = 101) were interviewed from three different forest dependency categories, adopting a stratified random sampling approach and using a semi-structured questionnaire. The study identified 13 locally important NTFPs, with five being critically important to supporting local livelihoods. Our study suggests that collection, processing and trading in NTFPs constitutes the primary occupation for about 18% of local inhabitants and account for an estimated 19% of their cash annual income. The household consensus on issues relating to NTFPs and their prospective role in conservation was surprisingly high, with 48% of respondents believing that promotion of NTFPs in the PA could have positive conservation value. The majority (71%) of households also had some understanding of the ecological implications of NTFP harvesting, sustainability (53%) and possible management and monitoring regimes (100%). With little known about their real application in the field, our study suggests further investigations are required to understand the ecological compatibility of traditional NTFP harvesting patterns and management.

Keywords

forest-based livelihood; biodiversity loss; rural poverty; ecological consensus; harvesting pattern; sustainability

Published in

International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology
2010, volume: 17, number: 2, pages: 180-188
Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC

SLU Authors

Associated SLU-program

SLU Swedish Biodiversity Centre

Global goals (SDG)

SDG12 Responsible consumption and production
SDG15 Life on land
SDG17 Partnerships for the goals

UKÄ Subject classification

Ecology

Publication identifier

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500903549676

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/48178