Abstract

We examined the geographical pattern in growth and adult body size among 14 populations of Swedish moose (Alces alces) using data from 4,294 moose (greater than or equal to 1.5 years old) killed during the hunting season in 1989-1992. In both sexes, adult body mass was significantly positively correlated with latitude. Moose in northern populations had a 15-20% larger adult body mass than moose in the south. Juvenile body mass was correlated with neither latitude nor adult body mass. Thus, variation in time (years) and rate of body growth after the juvenile stage were responsible for most of the variation in adult body mass among populations. Moose in northern populations grew for approximately 2 more years of life than southern moose. In contrast to adult body mass, skeletal size (measured as jawbone length) was not correlated with latitude, suggesting that variation in adult body mass was primarily due to differences in fat reserves. Discrimination between population characteristics, such as moose density, climate, and the amount of browse available to moose, showed climatic harshness to be the most important variable explaining geographical variation in body mass among populations. The results support the notion that in mammals body size increases with latitude in accordance with Bergmann's rule. We conclude that (1) variation in patterns of growth after the juvenile stage is the main cause of the latitudinal trend in adult body size in moose, and (2) climatic conditions are a more important factor than population density and availability of food in explaining geographical variation in growth patterns and adult body mass between populations of Swedish moose.

Keywords

GROWTH AND BODY SIZE; LATITUDINAL VARIATION; BERGMANNS RULE; LIFE-HISTORY VARIATION; ALCES ALCES

Published in

Oecologia
1995, Volume: 102, number: 4, pages: 433-442
Publisher: SPRINGER VERLAG

SLU Authors

• Sand, Håkan

  • Department of Wildlife Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

• Cederlund, Göran

  • Department of Wildlife Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

• Danell, Kjell

  • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

UKÄ Subject classification

Zoology
Ecology


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341355

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/51312