Fischer, Klara
- Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2015Peer reviewedOpen access
Fischer, Klara; Ekener-Petersen, Elisabeth; Rydhmer, Lotta; Edvardsson Björnberg, Karin
It has recently been argued that the fragmented knowledge on the social impacts of genetically modified (GM) crops is contributing to the polarised debate on the matter. This paper addresses this issue by systematically reviewing 99 peer-reviewed journal articles published since 2004 on the social impacts of GM crops in agriculture; summarising current knowledge, and identifying research gaps. Economic impact studies currently dominate the literature and mainly report that GM crops provide economic benefits for farmers. Other social impacts are less well studied, but present a more complex picture. Studies on access to and benefits of GM crops show that these vary significantly depending on the political and regulatory setting. Substantial evidence indicates that intellectual property rights (IPR) and the private industry's dominance limit the access and utility of available GM crops to many farmers. Wellbeing is frequently discussed in the literature, but rarely investigated empirically. Existing evidence is contradictory and inconclusive. Impact studies from the Global North are virtually non-existent. Moreover, two-thirds of publications are based on previously published empirical evidence, indicating a need for new empirical investigations into the social impacts of GM crops in agriculture.
social impact; Genetically Modified Organism (GMO); biotechnology; agriculture; farm; sustainability
Sustainability
2015, volume: 7, number: 7, pages: 8598-8620
Publisher: MDPI
Genetics and Breeding in Agricultural Sciences
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/68571