Research article - Peer-reviewed, 2017
Apparent Winter CO2 uptake by a boreal forest due to decoupling
Jocher, Georg; Ottosson Löfvenius, Mikaell; De Simon, Giuseppe; Hörnlund, Thomas; Linder, Sune; Lundmark, Tomas; Marshall, John D; Nilsson, Mats; Näsholm, Torgny; Tarvainen, Lasse; Öquist, Mats; Peichl, MatthiasAbstract
Net uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) was observed during the winter when using the eddy covariance (EC) technique above a 90-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand in northern Sweden. This uptake occurred despite photosynthetic dormancy. This discrepancy led us to investigate the potential impact of decoupling of below- and above-canopy air mass flow and accompanying below-canopy horizontal advection on these measurements. We used the correlation of above- and below-canopy standard deviation of vertical wind speed (sigma(w)), derived from EC measurements above and below the canopy, as the main mixing criterion. We identified 0.33 m s(-1) and 0.06 m s(-1) as site-specific o thresholds for above and below canopy, respectively, to reach the fully coupled state. Decoupling was observed in 45% of all cases during the measurement period (5.11.2014-25.2.2015). After filtering out decoupled periods the above-canopy mean winter NEE shifted from -0.52 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) to a more reasonable positive value of 0.31 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). None of the above-canopy data filtering criteria we tested (i.e., friction velocity threshold; horizontal wind speed threshold; single-level sigma(w) threshold) ensured sufficient mixing. All missed critical periods that were detected only by the two-level filtering approach. Tower-surrounding topography induced a predominant below-canopy wind direction and consequent wind shear between above- and below-canopy air masses. These processes may foster decoupling and below-canopy removal of CO2 rich air. To determine how broadly such a topographical influence might apply, we compared the topography surrounding our tower to that surrounding other forest flux sites worldwide. Medians of maximum elevation differences within 300m and 1000 m around 110 FLUXNET forest EC towers were 24 m and 66 m, respectively, compared to 24 m and 114 m, respectively, at our site. Consequently, below canopy flow may influence above-canopy NEE detections at many forested EC sites. Based on our findings we suggest below-canopy measurements as standard procedure at sites evaluating forest CO2 budgets.Keywords
Advection; Coupling/decoupling; Eddy covariance; FLUXNET; Net ecosystem CO2 exchange; Scots pinePublished in
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology2017, volume: 232, pages: 23-34
Authors' information
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Unit for Field-based Forest Research
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Unit for Field-based Forest Research
Hörnlund, Thomas
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Unit for Field-based Forest Research
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Marshall, John D (Marshall, John)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Tarvainen, Lasse
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Ecology and Management
UKÄ Subject classification
Forest Science
Publication Identifiers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.002
URI (permanent link to this page)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/77309