Abstract

In the aftermath of the 2001 World Trade Center bombings, the application of the label “terrorist” to one of the parties in a given conflict can serve to deny political legitimacy, and can make possible the use of extreme measures to deal with them. This article compares the fortunes of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and Hamas. Through the use of an analysis of contemporary discourses relating to terrorism, it is argued that, in the post-9/11 world, successfully ascribing a nonstate opponent as a terrorist permits the use of overwhelming force. The discourse thus becomes a powerful political technology in the hands of state actors, regardless of the justification for its use.

Published in

Asian Politics and Policy
2014, Volume: 6, number: 2, pages: 183-198

UKÄ Subject classification

Globalization Studies
Sociology (excluding Social work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12110

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/83548