Cashmore, Matthew
- University of East Anglia
Abstract
Environmental assessment is all intriguing policy phenomenon: it is employed in an ever-increasing range of contexts the world-over, yet research indicates it rarely efficiently or effectively achieves its principal purpose of promoting sustainable development. Increasingly, practical limitations in the effectiveness of environmental assessment are attributed to its theoretical shortcomings, particularly in relation to the conception of causation. This research advanced debate oil environmental assessment by examining the theoretical implications of ill empirical analysis of its causal operation in purposefully selected cases. The causal models derived from the research data illustrate the diversity of mechanisms through which environmental assessment can contribute to sustainability and provide an insight into the complexity and contextuality of causation in the empirical assessment can contribute to sustainability and provide an societal expectations concerning environmental assessment's contribution to sustainable development. It is concluded that the interplay or non-ration variables (such as power, agency, experiences and expectations) necessitates the pursuit of a reflexive accommodation of purposes, methods and context in environmental assessment practices. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
environmental assessment; policy appraisal; causation; sustainable development; governance
Published in
Journal of Environmental Management
2008, volume: 88, number: 4, pages: 1233-1248
SLU Authors
UKÄ Subject classification
Environmental Management
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Publication identifier
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.005
Permanent link to this page (URI)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/83845