Johnson, Richard
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2002Peer reviewed
Johnson, RK; Goedkoop, W
1. Spatial correlations between ecological patterns and processes are thought to be scale-dependent, yet surprisingly few studies have evaluated the correspondence between different levels of spatial scale and ecosystem structure and function.2. We evaluated the strength of relationships between the benthic macroinvertebrate communities of stony littoral habitats and levels of ecological scale and geographical position, using partial constrained ordination. Our hypothesis was that correlation strength would be inversely related to ecological scale, i.e. habitat > ecosystem > riparian > catchment > ecoregion.3. The effect of habitat was greater than that of other levels of spatial scale: 23% of the variance in taxonomic composition and 11% of that in functional composition was explained by habitat variables alone. However, greater spatial scales were also important. For example, the combined influence of riparian, catchment and ecoregion classification accounted for 24% (taxonomic) and 11% (functional) of the explained variance.4. Relationships between organisms and scale variables were, however, non-linear and a substantial amount of the functional variance was hidden in joint effects. These findings were not unexpected, and presumably indicate a close interdependence between local and regional-scale variables.
ecosystem; lakes; littoral; spatial scale; temperate; variance partitioning
Freshwater Biology
2002, Volume: 47, number: 10, pages: 1840-1854
Ecology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00932.x
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/88294