Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2006Peer reviewed

Wing loading and habitat selection in forest beetles: Are red-listed species poorer dispersers or more habitat-specific than common congenerics?

Gibb H, Hjalten J, Ball JP, Pettersson RB, Landin J, Alvini O, Danell K

Abstract

Traits such as poor dispersal ability and high habitat specificity are thought to predispose some species to a greater risk of extinction than others. Habitat preferences and morphological features associated with dispersal ability were compared between red-listed species and common congenerics co-occurring in boreal forests in northern Sweden. Measurements of body size, wing loading and wing aspect ratio were used to compare dispersal abilities, while catches from experimental treatments of dead wood were used to compare habitat preferences. We also compared how restricted red-listed species were to particular sites or habitats relative to common species. The red-listed Epuraea longipennis was longer and wider, while Epuraea. deubeli weighed less than common Epuraea species. In contrast to expectations, these red-listed species had a larger wing area (relative to their body mass) and thus a lower wing-loading than congeneric species, suggesting superior dispersal abilities. The red-listed Tachinus elegans possessed intermediate morphological characteristics, compared with common congenerics. However, the relationships between the P risk of extinction in fragmented habitats and size and dispersal ability are likely to be scale-dependent, so intermediate or superior dispersal abilities may increase extinction risk at some scales. Red-listed species were not found in fewer sites or habitat types than congenerics so were not more likely to be habitat specialists. However, some red-listed species preferred deeply shaded and Fomitopsis pinicola-inoculated logs, relative to congenerics, suggesting that specificity to these particular microhabitats may be connected with extinction risk. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Published in

Biological Conservation
2006, Volume: 132, number: 2, pages: 250-260
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD

      SLU Authors

    • Gibb, Heloise

      • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

      • Hjältén, Joakim

        • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

        • Ball, John

          • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

            • Landin, Jenny

              • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

              • Alinvi, Ola

                • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

                • Danell, Kjell

                  • Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

                UKÄ Subject classification

                Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

                Publication identifier

                DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.017

                Permanent link to this page (URI)

                https://res.slu.se/id/publ/8863