Abstract

The importance of bank erosion was quantified during three periods (October 2006-April 2007, May 2007-April 2008 and May 2008-April 2009) in the 486 km(2) catchment area of River Odense, Denmark. A catchment sediment budget was established including other sediment sources such as tile drains and surface runoff, in-channel and overbank sinks and storage and the resulting bed load and suspended sediment load exported from the catchment.Bank erosion and sedimentation were measured using ca. 3,000 erosion pins established in 180 pin plots, each consisting of three vertical lines of pins. Thirty-six representative reaches, each with a length of 100 m, were selected by a stratified random procedure in GIS. Bed load and suspended sediment export from the catchment were measured using a bed load sampler and from continuous measurements of turbidity at the outlet gauging station.The gross sediment input from bank erosion during the three study periods amounted to 21,100-25,200 t in the River Odense catchment, which is considerably higher than the estimated input of sediment from tile drains and surface runoff, which amounted to 220-500 t and 0-100 t, respectively. The measured bed load (20-490 t) was five to 60 times lower than the suspended sediment export from the catchment (1,240-2,620 t) during the three study periods, with the largest difference occurring in the driest year. Sediment sinks and storage were of high importance for the catchment sediment budget as the measured in-channel storage of sediment on stream banks was as high as 16,200-20,100 t, and the overbank sediment sink was estimated at 360-3,100 t.Bank erosion was the dominant sediment source (90-94 %) in the River Odense catchment during the three study years. In-channel and overbank sediment sinks and storage dominated the sediment budget as 79-94 % of the sediment input from all sources was not exported from the catchment during the three study years. Such a large attenuation of sediment in river channels and on floodplains is extremely important for fluvial habitats and ecology. Moreover, it has strong implications for attempts to document changes in sediment export following implementation of mitigation measures.

Keywords

Bank erosion; Fluvial sediment; Sediment budget; Storage

Published in

Journal of Soils and Sediments
2013, Volume: 13, number: 1, pages: 230-241
Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG

UKÄ Subject classification

Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0597-7

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/88664