Tasin, Marco
- Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)
Research article2018Peer reviewedOpen access
Salvagnin, Umberto; Malnoy, Mickael; Thoming, Gunda; Tasin, Marco; Carlin, Silvia; Martens, Stefan; Vrhovsek, Urska; Angeli, Sergio; Anfora, Gianfranco
Herbivorous insects use olfactory cues to locate their host plant within a complex olfactory landscape. One such example is the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana, a key pest of the grape in the Palearctic region, which recently expanded both its geographical and host plant range. Previous studies have showed that a synthetic blend of the three terpenoids, (E)-beta-caryophyllene, (E)-beta-farnesene and (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT), was as attractive for the moth as the complete grape odour profile in laboratory conditions. The same studies also showed that the specific ratio of these compounds in the grape bouquet was crucial because a percentage variation in any of the three volatiles resulted in almost complete inhibition of the blend's attractiveness. Here, we report on the creation of stable grapevine transgenic lines, with modified (E)-beta-caryophyllene and (E)-beta-farnesene emission and thus with an altered ratio compared to the original plants. When headspace collections from these plants were tested in wind tunnel behavioural assays, they were less attractive than control extracts. This result was confirmed by testing synthetic blends imitating the ratio found on natural and transformed plants, as well as by testing the plants themselves. With this evidence, we suggest that a strategy based on volatile ratio modification may also interfere with the host-finding behaviour of L. botrana in the field, creating avenues for new pest control methods.
Lobesia botrana; sesquiterpenes; (E)-beta-caryophyllene; (E)-beta-farnesene; host selection; Vitis vinifera
Plant Biotechnology Journal
2018, Volume: 16, number: 1, pages: 264-271 Publisher: WILEY
SLU Plant Protection Network
Ecology
Horticulture
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12767
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/93757