Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2017Peer reviewedOpen access

Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 6: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2017

Ricci, Antonia; Allende, Ana; Bolton, Declan; Chemaly, Marianne; Davies, Robert; Girones, Rosina; Koutsoumanis, Kostas; Lindqvist, Roland; Norrung, Birgit; Robertson, Lucy; Ru, Giuseppe; Escamez, Pablo Salvador Fernandez; Sanaa, Moez; Simmons, Marion; Skandamis, Panagiotis; Snary, Emma; Speybroeck, Niko; Ter Kuile, Benno; Threlfall, John; Wahlstrom, Helene;
Show more authors

Abstract

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) concept was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance of valid taxonomic units were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as "qualifications' which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's scientific Panels. No new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS taxonomic units and their qualifications. Between the end of September 2016 and March 2017, the QPS notification list was updated with 87 applications for market authorisation. From these, 32 biological agents already had a QPS status, and 37 were not included in the evaluation as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci. Streptomyces species (Streptomycescinnamonensis, Streptomyces mobaraensis and Streptomycesviolaceoruber), Bacilluscirculans (three notifications) and Escherichiacoli (seven notifications) were re-confirmed not suitable for QPS. Streptomycesrubiginosus and Streptomycesnetropsis, not evaluated within the previous mandate, were also not recommended for QPS. Streptomyces spp. andE.coli will be excluded from further QPS evaluations within the current QPS mandate. Hyphomicrobiumdenitrificans, which has never been evaluated before, was not recommended for the QPS list and for Pseudomonasamyloderamosa, the QPS assessment was not applicable because it is not a validated species. actobacillusanimalis was a new taxonomic unit recommended to have the QPS status.

Keywords

safety; QPS; bacteria; yeast; Hyphomicrobiumdenitrificans; Lactobacillusanimalis; Pseudomonasamyloderamosa

Published in

EFSA Journal
2017, volume: 15, number: 7, article number: 4884

SLU Authors

UKÄ Subject classification

Microbiology
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Publication identifier

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4884

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/96121