Raymond, Christopher
- Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Research article2018Peer reviewed
Gulsrud, Natalie Marie; Raymond, Christopher M.; Rutt, Rebecca L.; Olafsson, Anton Stahl; Plieninger, Tobias; Sandberg, Mattias; Beery, Thomas H.; Jonsson, K. Ingemar
Contemporary society is increasingly impacted by automation; however, few studies have considered the potential consequences of automation on ecosystems and their management (hereafter the automation of urban green infrastructure or UGI). This Perspective Essay takes up this discussion by asking how a digital approach to UGI planning and management mediates the configuration and development of UGI and to whose benefit? This is done through a review of key issues and trends in digital approaches to UGI planning and management. We first conceptualize automation from a social, ecological, and technological interactions perspective and use this lens to present an overview of the risks and opportunities of UGI automation with respect to selected case studies. Results of this analysis are used to develop a conceptual framework for the assessment of the material and governance implications of automated UGIs. We find that, within any given perspective, the automation of UGI entails a complex dialectic between efficiency, human agency and empowerment. Further, risks and opportunities associated with UGI automation are not fixed but are dynamic properties of changing contextual tensions concerning power, actors, rules of the game and discourse at multiple scales. We conclude the paper by outlining a research agenda on how to consider different digital advances within a social-ecological-technological approach.
Digital technology; Ecosystem services; Environmental governance; Social, ecological, technological systems; Smart city; Landscape management
Landscape and Urban Planning
2018, Volume: 180, pages: 85-92
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
SDG9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG11 Sustainable cities and communities
Ecology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.012
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/97266