Larsson, Oscar
- Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Abstract
Colin Hay's and Vivien Schmidt's responses to my previous critical engagement with their respective versions of neo-institutionalism raise the issue of how scholars may account for the ideational power of political processes and how ideas may generate both stability and change. Even though Hay, Schmidt, and I share a common philosophical ground in many respects, we nevertheless diverge in our views about how to account for ideational power and for actors' ability to navigate a social reality that is saturated with structures and meaning. There continues to be a need for an analytical framework that incorporates discourse and a constitutive logic based upon the power in ideas. Post-structural institutionalism (PSI) analyzes discourse as knowledge claims by means of the concept of a constitutive causality, analytically identified in respect to institutions, such that the substantive content of ideas/discourse provides ideational power and generates immanent change.
Keywords
constructivist institutionalism; discourses; discursive institutionalism; ideas; neo-institutionalism; post-structural institutionalism; post-structuralism; power; knowledge
Published in
Critical Review
2018, volume: 30, number: 3-4, pages: 325-346
Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
SLU Authors
UKÄ Subject classification
Political Science (Excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
Publication identifier
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2018.1567982
Permanent link to this page (URI)
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/99113