Abstract

Simulating yield response to different irrigation scenarios is important for agricultural production, especially in the arid region where agriculture depends heavily on irrigation. To better predict yield under different irrigation scenarios, the variation of normalized water productivity (WV') over the whole growing period of maize for seed production and the effect of different irrigation treatments on harvest index (HI) were investigated using field experiments from 2012 to 2015 in an arid region of northwest China. Two new non-linear dynamic WP* (WP*(KR-L) and WP*(KR-S)) models derived from the Logistic and Sigmoid equations, and four new HI (HIKR-J, HIKR-M, HIKR-B and HIKR-S) models developed on the basis of water deficit multiplicative or additive models at different growth stages were compared with the measurements and the WP* (WP*(AC)) and HI sub-model (HIAC) in the original AquaCrop model (Version 4.0). In addition, the WPA*c and HIAc models in the original AquaCrop model were replaced by the optimal WP* and HI models to build the AquaCrop-KR model. Then the yield simulated by the AquaCrop-KR model was compared with the measured yield and the yield simulated by the original AquaCrop model. The results show that both WP*(KR-L) and WP*(KR-S) models improved the simulation of final biomass, especially for the WPiat model. The tested HI sub-models, namely HIKR-J, HIKR-M and HIKR-S models had good performance to simulate HI under different irrigation scenarios, and the HIKR-M model was the best among all tested sub-models. When both WP*(KR-L). and HIKR-M sub-models were embedded into Aquacrop, the performance of the AquaCrop model was improved significantly to simulate yield, especially under severe water stress condition, with R-2 increased from 0.496 to 0.653, NRMSE decreased from 26.2% to 16.1% and EF increased from 0.055 to 0.642.

Keywords

AquaCrop; Harvest index model; Water productivity model; Water stress; Yield simulation

Published in

Field Crops Research
2019, Volume: 234, pages: 73-86
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

SLU Authors

• Parsons, David

  • Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

UKÄ Subject classification

Agricultural Science


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.009

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/99263