Abstract

Electric irrigation contributes to food security in rural India, but deteriorating electrical infrastructures threaten the functioning of farmers' pump sets. This problem could be solved through investments in energy-efficient technologies. However, network externalities create a coordination problem for farmers. We develop a framed field experiment to study the effects of group size, leading by example, and payoff structures on the ability to coordinate technology adoption investments. The experiment is based on a game that combines features of a step-level public goods game and a critical mass game. Our findings show that smaller groups more frequently coordinate on payoff-superior equilibria and that higher payoffs lead to more investments. Contrary to previous studies, leading by example reduces investments but has no effect on efficiency. Building on this analysis, we discuss possible bottom-up solutions to the energy crisis in rural India.

Keywords

Step-level public goods game; leading by example; group size; framed field experiment

Published in

German Economic Review
2018, Volume: 19, number: 2, pages: 119-139

UKÄ Subject classification

Economics


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12117

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/95688