Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Research article2024Peer reviewedOpen access

Enrichment of thawed boar spermatozoa with an intact membrane using Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting

Johannisson, Anders; Morrell, Jane; Wallgren, Margareta

Abstract

Not all boar sperm samples survive cryopreservation well. A method of eliminating damaged sperm might enable more cryopreserved boar semen to be used for pig breeding. In this study we investigated the use of Magnetic Activated Cell sorting (MACS) to eliminate damaged sperm from thawed boar semen samples. The thawed samples were mixed with Dead cell removal particles and were applied to the column in a SuperMACS II. Different fractions were collected: Original sample (O), Flow-through (FT), and Eluate (E). Sperm membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential and reactive oxygen species were evaluated by flow cytometry after staining with SYBR 14 and propidium iodide, or 5 ', 6, 6 '-tetrachloro-1, 1 ', 3, 3 '-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide, or hydroethidine and dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate, respectively. The FT samples had increased membrane integrity, a greater proportion of sperm with high mitochondrial membrane potential and a greater proportion of sperm negative for hydrogen peroxide than O samples (P<0.0001), which in turn had increased membrane integrity than E samples (P <0.0001). However, differences were seen between boars. The FT samples had increased values of live, superoxide positive sperm than O samples (P <0.0001) and O samples had greater values than E samples (P <0.0001), while there was no effect of boar. Sperm quality was best in the FT fraction, comprising approximately 32% of the sperm sample. In conclusion, although there were differences between boars, MACS separation can improve sperm quality in thawed semen samples. It would be interesting to see if this improvement is reflected in fertility outcomes.

Keywords

MACS; Cryopreserved boar semen; Sperm membrane damage; Apoptosis; Reactive Oxygen Species; Reproductive biotechnologies

Published in

Animal Reproduction Science
2024, Volume: 256, article number: 107493