Abstract

This study measured soil stress underneath a rolling wheel by using two different types of sensors: a load cell type probe referred to as an Arvidsson probe to read vertical soil stress and a fluid inclusion type sensor referred to as a Bolling probe to read soil mean normal stress. Measurements were compared with simulations using a semi-empirical as well as a finite element model. The latter allowed us to consider a layered soil profile as well as an elastoplastic constitutive relationship in the simulations. In addition, the finite element model was used to quantify the ratio between the Bolling probe pressure and the soil mean normal stress. The Bolling probe pressure was found to be primarily a function of the soil's Poisson ratio, which supports findings from earlier studies. Our results showed better agreement between measurements and simulations for vertical stress ( obtained from the Arvidsson probe readings) than for mean normal stress ( calculated from the Bolling probe measurements). The finite element simulations revealed that soil properties had little influence on vertical stress, and the distribution with depth of the vertical stress could be well described by the classical Boussinesq solution. However, soil properties had a significant impact on the mean normal stress. The widely used semi-empirical Frohlich model performed poorly, which may have been because of an inconsistency in the model assumptions.

Published in

Soil Science Society of America Journal
2016, Volume: 80, number: 3, pages: 541-553
Publisher: SOIL SCI SOC AMER

SLU Authors

• Keller, Thomas

  • Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    
  • Agroscope

UKÄ Subject classification

Soil Science


Publication identifier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.07.0252

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/77628