Sammanfattning

This article illustrates the interconnectedness of science and politics through a case study of old-growth forest conflict in Finnish Upper Lapland. It demonstrates the ways in which "traditional science" has failed to settle the decades-long conflict between state forestry and traditional Sami reindeer herding, and discusses the potential of democratization of science through more inclusive forms of knowledge production. The analysis, which is based on qualitative interview data, shows that a traditional science focus on biological indicators and mathematical modeling has provided only a partial account of the reindeer herding-forestry interactions by ignoring the local, place-specific practices that are equally important in understanding the overall quality of pasture conditions in Upper Lapland. It concludes that an inclusive inquiry, structured according to the principles of joint fact-finding, could create a more policy-relevant, and also more scientifically robust, knowledge basis for future forest management and policy decisions.

Nyckelord

democratization of science; forest policy; joint fact-finding; participation; politicization of science; postnormal science

Publicerad i

Nature and Culture
2013, Volym: 8, nummer: 1, sidor: 53-73
Utgivare: BERGHAHN JOURNALS

SLU författare

• Raitio, Kaisa

  • Institutionen för stad och land, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
    

Globala målen

SDG16 Främja fredliga och inkluderande samhällen för hållbar utveckling, tillhandahålla tillgång till rättvisa för alla samt bygga upp effektiva, och inkluderande institutioner med ansvarsutkrävande på alla nivåer


UKÄ forskningsämne

Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Tvärvetenskapliga studier


Publikationens identifierare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2013.080104

Permanent länk till denna sida (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/51327