Sammanfattning

Non-governmental organizations (NGO) and government donor agencies (GDA) are often caught in a dilemma; an NGO between responsiveness to its target group(s), expectations of individual donors and demands of its GDA; GDA between its policy to respect NGO's integrity, its wish to keep NGOs accountable for received fund and its operation within the bounds of its general policies. This dilemma is mirrored in the NGO-GDA negotiation for funds. Based on negotiation theory and using three explanatory approaches, 18 years of negotiations between an NGO, Vi Skogen (ViS) and its GDA, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), are analyzed in order to demonstrate how organizational structures, power relations and the context influence the outcome of the negotiations. All three approaches help to explain how ViS managed, mainly in the interest of its individual donors, to resist changes demanded by Sida and also to explain how the agendas of ViS and Sida finally converged.

Nyckelord

Negotiation theory; Policy change; Government donor agency; Development cooperation

Publicerad i

Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations
2010, Volym: 21, nummer: 3, sidor: 371-392
Utgivare: SPRINGER

SLU författare

• Johansson, Karl-Erik

  • Institutionen för skogens produkter, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
    

• Nylund, Jan-Erik

  • Institutionen för skogens produkter, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
    

• Persson, Reidar

  • Institutionen för skogens produkter, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
    

Globala målen

SDG1 Fattigdom omfattar fler dimensioner än den ekonomiska. Fattigdom innebär bl.a. även brist på frihet, makt, inflytande, hälsa, utbildning och fysisk säkerhet.


UKÄ forskningsämne

Ekonomi och näringsliv
Samhällsvetenskap


Publikationens identifierare

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9131-y

Permanent länk till denna sida (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/59984