What is a better chicken? Exploring trade-offs between animal welfare and greenhouse gas emissions in higher-welfare broiler systems

Abstract

Due to the animal welfare concerns in conventional methods of rearing broilers, chicken raised for meat, there is a push towards transition to higher welfare methods. However, this results in trade-offs as some aspects of higher welfare systems reduce production efficiency and thus increase greenhouse gas emissions. These trade-offs have however rarely been studied. This study aims to further the understanding by comparing the impact of reducing stocking density and switching to slower-growing broiler hybrids on broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. Impacts on broiler welfare were determined by synthesizing quantitative welfare indicators from recent studies which assessed the welfare of broilers at different stocking densities and/or growth rates. The impact on greenhouse gas emissions from introducing these changes were modelled for chicken meat produced in Swedish broiler systems. Then, the magnitude of trade-offs associated with a reduced stocking density and/or use of slower-growing broilers were determined based on how these impacted broiler welfare and greenhouse gas emissions. The largest trade-offs were found when using slower-growing hybrids, since while this increased broiler welfare considerably, it also increased greenhouse gas emissions. The magnitude of the trade-offs was largely dependent on the growth rate of the slower-growing hybrid. Slower growth rates increased feed intake, and hence greenhouse gas emissions, but increased greenhouse gas emissions were partly offset by reduced emissions from parent animals. Trade-offs were smaller when reducing the stocking density in broiler houses, due to a moderate improvement of welfare but only a slight impact on greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the existing tensions between improving broiler welfare and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and the need for tools to navigate these trade-offs. However, as greenhouse gas emissions from broiler production remain considerably lower than those of other livestock when higher welfare methods are used, we question whether minimizing greenhouse gas emissions should be a priority when conflicting with improving broiler and breeder welfare.

Keywords

Animal welfare; Broiler; Carbon footprint; Slower-growing; Stocking density; Trade-offs

Published in

Sustainable Production and Consumption
2025, volume: 55, pages: 203-216
Publisher: ELSEVIER

SLU Authors

• Karlsson, Ludvig

  • Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

• Keeling, Linda

  • Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

• Röös, Elin

  • Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
    

UKÄ Subject classification

Environmental Sciences
Animal and Dairy Science

Publication identifier

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.015

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/141151