Skip to main content
SLU publication database (SLUpub)

Abstract

This study analysed the environmental impacts of taxation on Swedish food consumption and sought to identify potential synergies and goal conflicts between environmental aspects. This was done by analysing various taxation scenarios to reduce environmental impacts of food, including taxation based on: climate impact; a score based on weighting of several environmental impacts; and adjusted rates of value-added tax (VAT).A net decrease in food consumption was seen for most taxation scenarios, resulting in reduced burdens for climate change and most other environmental categories. An exception was found for a scenario simulating reduced VAT rates for plant-based products, where a net increase of food consumption was seen, resulting in an increased burden for all environmental categories. Many of the scenarios resulted in a decrease in beef consumption, and hence a decline in pasture use. This is positive from a global perspective by limiting expansion of agricultural land, but on regional level in Sweden it could cause a goal conflict with maintaining biodiversity-rich semi-natural pastures. To avoid this, beef production on semi-natural pastures could be further incentivised by production-side measures. With regard to biodiversity loss, the overall burden could increase if taxation leads to an increase in products from biodiverse regions.

Keywords

Food; Climate tax; Value-added tax; Environmental impacts; Synergies; Goal conflicts

Published in

Food Policy
2021, volume: 101, article number: 102090
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCI LTD

SLU Authors

Global goals (SDG)

SDG12 Responsible consumption and production
SDG13 Climate action

UKÄ Subject classification

Economics
Environmental Management

Publication identifier

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102090

Permanent link to this page (URI)

https://res.slu.se/id/publ/112644