Fahlvik, Nils
- Institutionen för sydsvensk skogsvetenskap, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Forskningsartikel2014Vetenskapligt granskadÖppen tillgång
Fahlvik N, Elfving B, Wikstrom P
The performance of growth models implemented in the Swedish Forest Planning System Heureka was evaluated. Four basal area growth models were evaluated by comparing their predictions to data from five-year growth records for 1711 permanent sample plots of the National Forest Inventory (NFI-data). Also, two alternative implementations of Heureka, including a combined stand- and tree-level basal area growth model and a single tree-level model, respectively, were evaluated using data from 57 blocks in a thinning experiment (GG-data) involving Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) in which the trees were monitored for 30 years after the first thinning. The predicted volume growth was also compared to observed values. Growth models based on data from 1970's and 1980's overestimated growth in the NFI test plots from the early 2000's by about 3%. Stand-level models had larger precision than tree-level models. Basal area growth was underestimated in dense NFI-plots and overestimated in non-thinned GG-plots, illustrating an un-solved modelling problem. Basal area growth was overestimated by 2-5% also in the GG-plots over the whole observation period. Volume growth was however accurately predicted for pine and underestimated by 2% for spruce. The relative prediction error did not increase with increasing length of prediction period. Thinning response models calibrated with GG-data worked well in the total application and produced growth levels for different thinning alternatives in line with observations.
validation; empirical; simulation; basal area; volume
Silva Fennica
2014, Volym: 48, nummer: 2, artikelnummer: 1013Utgivare: Finnish Society of Forest Science, Finnish Forest Research Institute
SLU Future Forests
Skogsvetenskap
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1013
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/66274